Without a gate
The agent can execute the wire as soon as it sees a matching invoice.
Interactive tool
See what happens when an AI agent tries to release a $100,000 wire transfer to a changed bank account.
The same three checks apply whether the asset is money, code, or a customer relationship. That consistency is the point.
Action request
The agent can execute the wire as soon as it sees a matching invoice.
The action must wait, prove source integrity, and show human authorization before release.
The action is still inside the mandatory delay window, so execution is held.
The source record and confidence score support automatic evaluation.
The approval signal is consistent with the source evidence.
Formal layer retained: elapsed time must exceed the required hold, trust must stay non-negative, and source direction multiplied by authorization direction must not equal a bypass signature.
Every request is tied to an agent, asset, owner, and case identifier.
The demo treats money, production, and refunds as separate high-risk scopes.
Uncertain cases become owner review, not silent automation.
The decision path is preserved as an explainable event chain.
Audit event preview
The business problem
Most AI safety demos stop at prompts and responses. Operators need a control plane for actions: who or what is asking, which system will be touched, whether the evidence is trustworthy, and whether the action should wait for human review.
The formal layer
Under the console is the same dual-invariant logic: irreversible action must wait long enough to be recallable, and the request must preserve a clean chain of provenance and authorization. The UI translates that into business decisions.
Implementation path
The practical work is mapping your irreversible actions, defining approval windows, connecting source-of-truth evidence, and deciding which cases are automatic, held, escalated, or blocked.